Hometime, once a rising star in Australia’s short-term rental tech scene, positioned itself as the “operating system for Airbnb property managers.” By combining automated guest communication, cleaner scheduling, payments, and dynamic pricing into one sleek interface, the Sydney-based startup promised to make property management seamless and scalable.
But in 2022–2023, Hometime underwent a major UI overhaul—a complete pivot meant to transition from a service-first brand to a self-serve SaaS platform. The result? A messy, disjointed experience that confused loyal hosts, broke workflows, and quietly led to account losses, public criticism, and an internal scramble to regain trust.
From Partner to Platform: The Confusing Pivot
The old Hometime dashboard was tailored for:
- Property managers
- Airbnb hosts with multiple listings
- Agencies relying on streamlined communication and scheduling
It featured clear overviews of:
- Upcoming bookings
- Cleaner assignments
- Payment summaries
- Real-time guest updates
The new UI, however, rebranded everything around vague “Opportunities,” “Tasks,” and “Insights.” While visually polished, it:
- Hid critical information under new labels
- Removed calendar syncing from the home view
- Replaced familiar terms (e.g., “Booking” with “Event”)
- Changed icons and button placements with no onboarding
Hosts who were used to glancing at their weekly schedule or confirming cleaning assignments now had to click through three layers of cards just to find the same data. The friction was immediate—and costly.
Cleaning Management Became Chaos
Hometime’s biggest strength was its cleaner coordination. But the new interface:
- Removed auto-notifications for cleaners in favour of “manual confirmation flows”
- No longer showed cleaner availability side-by-side with bookings
- Had a mobile experience so laggy it was unusable for on-the-go workers
Cleaners missed jobs. Hosts received last-minute cancellations. Some began using WhatsApp groups to manually coordinate, which defeated the purpose of the app altogether.
For a platform that promised “hands-free hosting,” the UI shift introduced more manual work than ever.
Revenue Tracking Vanished Into Confusion
Before the pivot, users could:
- View payouts per booking
- Track cleaning expenses vs income
- Export monthly summaries for BAS or tax
Post-redesign:
- Earnings were grouped into a single “wallet” view
- Booking-level revenue was no longer itemised
- Fees, charges, and tax splits were buried in CSV downloads (with no explanations)
Many users believed they were being underpaid—not because they were, but because the UI failed to clarify how payments worked anymore. The trust gap widened quickly, especially for agencies managing multiple properties.
Poor Communication, No Rollback Option
The redesign launched without a beta phase, toggle option, or adequate support materials. Hosts logged in one morning and were met with:
- A “welcome to your new Hometime experience” banner
- No tutorials
- No migration tools
- No in-app feedback button
Worse, the help documentation had not been updated to match the new UI. Users searching for answers in the help centre were shown outdated screenshots and deprecated workflows.
This alienated longtime users who had integrated Hometime into their daily operations.
Churn, Backlash, and Lost Loyalty
Within three months of the redesign:
- Forum posts and LinkedIn complaints surfaced from former customers
- Several boutique agencies publicly announced they were switching to Hostaway or Guesty
- Google Play and App Store reviews dropped sharply, with 1-star reviews citing:
- “Where did the calendar go?”
- “Support is ignoring me”
- “Redesign broke everything, I’m out.”
Despite rapid hotfixes and UX adjustments, the reputational damage had been done. Users no longer felt the app was built for them.
Lessons from the Hometime UI Failure
- Don’t remove what works. If a feature is core to a user’s workflow, don’t bury it behind new language or layers.
- Never launch a full redesign without onboarding. Change is fine—but users need orientation, tutorials, and opt-in time.
- Avoid design for design’s sake. A polished UI means nothing if functionality is disrupted.
- Power users drive your product. When you alienate your most active users, you lose more than revenue—you lose advocacy.
- Every visual metaphor must map to real-world logic. Replacing “bookings” with “opportunities” is branding fluff that breaks context.
FAQs
1. What caused the Hometime redesign backlash?
Critical information was hidden, workflows were disrupted, and familiar tools were renamed without guidance.
2. Was the platform still functional?
Yes, but features were harder to find, slower to access, and no longer intuitive—especially on mobile.
3. Did Hometime explain the changes?
Poorly. The redesign launched with minimal communication, no migration support, and outdated help resources.
4. How did users react?
Many switched platforms, left negative reviews, or began manually coordinating what the app used to automate.
5. Could the issue have been avoided?
Yes—with better user research, optional onboarding phases, and a willingness to listen before forcing a redesign.
Leave a Reply